Who we are

About PersonalityMe

PersonalityMe makes personality and career-interest assessments easier to understand without turning a score into a fixed identity or a career instruction.

What we publish

PersonalityMe is an educational assessment and publishing project. The site offers four free assessments—16-Type, Big Five, Enneagram, and RIASEC—alongside profile explainers, comparison guides, and articles about interpreting results.

Our aim is practical: explain what a result measures, what it does not measure, and which questions it may help a reader ask next. We prefer scores, ranges, context, and uncertainty over dramatic labels.

What the site is for

The assessments and guides are designed for personal reflection, learning, and development. They may help readers find language for recurring preferences, interests, or motivations. They are not medical or psychological diagnoses and must not be used for hiring, selection, promotion, or deciding whether someone is suitable for a role.

No result proves ability, values, character, relationship compatibility, or career success. People change across settings and time, and self-report answers are affected by mood, interpretation, experience, and context.

How we work

Long-form profile copy is maintained as structured editorial source material rather than generated afresh for each visit. Assessment item banks, scoring rules, display limits, and source notes are documented separately from the page templates.

You can inspect our methodology, source register, and editorial policy. Public content is attributed to PersonalityMe Editorial, the accountable publishing identity for this site.

Ownership and independence

PersonalityMe is operated by molebyte Ltd. The site is independent and is not endorsed by or affiliated with the publishers of commercial personality or career assessments. Product wording and report copy are original unless a source is explicitly identified.

Questions or corrections

If you spot a factual error, unclear limitation, inaccessible page, or source that needs attention, please use the contact page. We would rather correct a weak explanation than defend it.