Principles used across every assessment
All four assessments use self-report questions. The answer is scored only against the dimension or type recorded for that item; scoring is never inferred from question order. We preserve the assessment version, item identifier, wording version, and scoring direction so a result can be traced to the instrument that produced it.
Results are educational interpretations. They can describe patterns in a set of answers, but they cannot verify a fixed identity, diagnose a condition, establish competence, or predict success. Scores near a boundary receive softer language because small answer changes could change the displayed result.
Big Five
The Big Five assessment uses the 50-item IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers: ten items for each broad factor and a five-point response scale. Positively keyed answers keep their 1–5 value; negatively keyed answers are scored as 6 − response. The ten scored values are averaged, then converted for display with round(((average − 1) / 4) × 100).
IPIP names one source factor Emotional Stability. Where the product displays Neuroticism, the direction is inverted explicitly as 100 − Emotional Stability. Results show five broad domain scores on a 0–100 product scale. They are not population percentiles, and the current assessment does not claim scored facets or a normative comparison sample.
RIASEC
The RIASEC assessment uses an original 60-item bank: ten activity-interest prompts for each of six areas—Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional. Each response runs from 0 (strongly dislike) to 4 (strongly like). Each area total therefore runs from 0 to 40 and is displayed as round((total / 40) × 100).
The six areas are ranked, but a three-letter code is treated as provisional when the third and fourth scores are close. Ties are preserved. Scores describe interest in activities, not skill, qualification, values, salary potential, or a prediction that a particular occupation will fit.
16-Type
The 16-Type assessment uses 48 original bipolar prompts across four preference pairs: Extraversion–Introversion, Sensing–Intuition, Thinking–Feeling, and Judging–Perceiving. Each item stores its left and right type explicitly so the visual answer position cannot be mistaken for the scoring direction.
Middle answers add zero, slight answers add one point, and strong answers add two points toward the selected letter. Each preference-pair total can therefore run from −24 to +24. The four-letter result is a shorthand for which side led on each pair, and raw pair scores are retained. A zero is flagged as borderline; stronger responses and response counts break a tie when possible. If a complete tie remains, the display fallback is I, S, F, or J for the relevant pair while the zero score and borderline flag remain explicit. The assessment is an original educational product and is not the MBTI® assessment.
Enneagram
The Enneagram assessment uses 90 original self-description items: ten for each core type, answered from 1 (not at all like me) to 5 (very much like me). Each type average is adjusted by subtracting the person’s average across all 90 responses. The adjusted scores are ranked, and the gap between first and second informs the confidence wording: under 0.15 is very close, 0.15–0.29 a slight lead, 0.30–0.49 a moderate lead, and 0.50 or more a clear lead.
A wing is considered only after the likely core type has been identified, and only the two adjacent types are compared. The current version does not measure instinctual stacking, tritype, clinical health levels, or diagnosis.
Editorial interpretation
Scoring produces a structured result. Editorial modules then explain the relevant range, interactions, and cautions. Dimensional assessments such as Big Five and RIASEC are assembled from reusable score modules rather than pretending every possible score combination is a separate fixed profile.
For the exact external references and licensing notes behind these choices, see Sources and assessment foundations. To report a concern, contact us.